<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Web Mozarts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webmozarts.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webmozarts.com</link>
	<description>On The Art Of Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:08:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why sfContext::getInstance() Is Bad by Bernhard</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/07/01/why-sfcontextgetinstance-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=380#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>@Interested: Just inject the I18N instance into the form. I&#039;m doing that too. 

$form = new myForm($i18n, ...);

And concerning the helpers... it&#039;s probably better not to use them at all and rely on the underlying implementation. format_date(), f.i., is just a wrapper for sfNumberFormat. So use sfNumberFormat instead.

@John: What do you mean? In the form? Inject them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Interested: Just inject the I18N instance into the form. I&#8217;m doing that too. </p>
<p>$form = new myForm($i18n, &#8230;);</p>
<p>And concerning the helpers&#8230; it&#8217;s probably better not to use them at all and rely on the underlying implementation. format_date(), f.i., is just a wrapper for sfNumberFormat. So use sfNumberFormat instead.</p>
<p>@John: What do you mean? In the form? Inject them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why sfContext::getInstance() Is Bad by John</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/07/01/why-sfcontextgetinstance-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=380#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>How is it possible to get &quot;multiple sfUser instances&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it possible to get &#8220;multiple sfUser instances&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why sfContext::getInstance() Is Bad by Interested</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/07/01/why-sfcontextgetinstance-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=380#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>And how about I18n or other helpers loading in Form, or Model class (sfContext::getInstance()-&gt;getConfiguration()-&gt;loadHelpers(&#039;I18N&#039;);)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how about I18n or other helpers loading in Form, or Model class (sfContext::getInstance()-&gt;getConfiguration()-&gt;loadHelpers(&#8217;I18N&#8217;);)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Us by Symfony 2 utilizará PHPUnit &#124; Symfony.es</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/about-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Symfony 2 utilizará PHPUnit &#124; Symfony.es</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmozarts.com/?page_id=2#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>[...] Bernard Schussek, máximo responsable de lime dentro del equipo de desarrollo de Symfony, se ocupará a partir de ahora de sfForms 2, la nueva versión del framework de formularios con la que podrá hacer realidad alguna de las buenas ideas que presentó en sus artículos Improving the Forms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bernard Schussek, máximo responsable de lime dentro del equipo de desarrollo de Symfony, se ocupará a partir de ahora de sfForms 2, la nueva versión del framework de formularios con la que podrá hacer realidad alguna de las buenas ideas que presentó en sus artículos Improving the Forms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Unit Testing by Christian</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/06/30/easy-unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=334#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>@Bernhard
http://test.ical.ly/2010/02/24/alles-neu-in-symfony-2-0-jetzt-auch-das-testen-mit-phpunit/
magst du dich vielleicht mal zu den aktuellen Entwicklungen melden? Wäre toll!

Gruss
/Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bernhard<br />
<a href="http://test.ical.ly/2010/02/24/alles-neu-in-symfony-2-0-jetzt-auch-das-testen-mit-phpunit/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="liexternal">http://test.ical.ly/2010/02/24/alles-neu-in-symfony-2-0-jetzt-auch-das-testen-mit-phpunit/</a><br />
magst du dich vielleicht mal zu den aktuellen Entwicklungen melden? Wäre toll!</p>
<p>Gruss<br />
/Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Unit Testing by • Alles neu in Symfony 2.0, auch das Testen? &#124; test.ical.ly</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/06/30/easy-unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>• Alles neu in Symfony 2.0, auch das Testen? &#124; test.ical.ly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=334#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>[...] erstaunlicher, dass es bisher keine eigene Website für Lime 2 gibt und die letzten Blogposts [1], [2] zum Thema liegt mittlerweile 3 bis 9 Monate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] erstaunlicher, dass es bisher keine eigene Website für Lime 2 gibt und die letzten Blogposts [1], [2] zum Thema liegt mittlerweile 3 bis 9 Monate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why sfContext::getInstance() Is Bad by Christopher Shennan</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/07/01/why-sfcontextgetinstance-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Shennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=380#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve usually come across this when using sfForm and I get around this by using the constructor injector mentioned above but pass the object I want as an option i.e. 

$form = new myForm(array(), array(&#039;sf_guard_user&#039; =&gt; $user));

Passing it in this manner allows me to access it in the form class via $this-&gt;options[&#039;sf_guard_user&#039;];</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve usually come across this when using sfForm and I get around this by using the constructor injector mentioned above but pass the object I want as an option i.e. </p>
<p>$form = new myForm(array(), array(&#8217;sf_guard_user&#8217; =&gt; $user));</p>
<p>Passing it in this manner allows me to access it in the form class via $this-&gt;options['sf_guard_user'];</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why sfContext::getInstance() Is Bad by jwesker</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/07/01/why-sfcontextgetinstance-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>jwesker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=380#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>@gpilotino, Yeah, how is sfContext::getInstace() avoidable from the generator, and also from the form classes? is it possible to inject dependency on the forms too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gpilotino, Yeah, how is sfContext::getInstace() avoidable from the generator, and also from the form classes? is it possible to inject dependency on the forms too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Unit Testing by • Was wird man von Lime 2 erwarten können? &#124; test.ical.ly</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/06/30/easy-unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>• Was wird man von Lime 2 erwarten können? &#124; test.ical.ly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=334#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>[...] Quelle: http://webmozarts.com/2009/06/30/easy-unit-testing/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quelle: <a href="http://webmozarts.com/2009/06/30/easy-unit-testing/" rel="nofollow" class="liinternal">http://webmozarts.com/2009/06/30/easy-unit-testing/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Speedup: Profile your symfony app using Xdebug by Christian Weyand</title>
		<link>http://webmozarts.com/2009/05/01/speedup-performance-profiling-for-your-symfony-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Weyand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmozarts.com/?p=276#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Hi,

i read your article and it&#039;s been very informative.. when i profiled the symfony project i found several  entries in the list..

i couldn&#039;t see any cycles in your graph so i wonder if there&#039;s something really f**** up in our configuration or it&#039;s not unusual to have cycle entries (sfFilterChain-&gt;execute -&gt; sfCommonFilter-&gt;execute -&gt;  -&gt; sfFilterChain-&gt;execute.. that&#039;s somehow weird.. and i don&#039;t think that&#039;s how the output of cachegrind should look like :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>i read your article and it&#8217;s been very informative.. when i profiled the symfony project i found several  entries in the list..</p>
<p>i couldn&#8217;t see any cycles in your graph so i wonder if there&#8217;s something really f**** up in our configuration or it&#8217;s not unusual to have cycle entries (sfFilterChain-&gt;execute -&gt; sfCommonFilter-&gt;execute -&gt;  -&gt; sfFilterChain-&gt;execute.. that&#8217;s somehow weird.. and i don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s how the output of cachegrind should look like <img src='http://webmozarts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
